Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
you really suck at linking to images from the forum, you have to blow them up
before taking the link ;p
anyway, assigning to me as i killed it.
Original comment by refraction
on 23 Aug 2012 at 12:15
people should stop using imagecrap
blowing up images to full screen has been broken for yonks
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2012 at 8:04
Original comment by refraction
on 23 Aug 2012 at 10:02
Assigning to Sudo for now, hes good with these AMD only issues. (Works fine on
Intel i7 cpu in all revisions up to current)
Original comment by refraction
on 23 Aug 2012 at 10:04
...you're either wrong about the revision it's introduced in or ref's wrong
about it not happening for him. And it's certainly not an AMD CPU issue, while
it MIGHT be an ATI graphics card issue (but probably isn't).
Original comment by sudonim1
on 23 Aug 2012 at 10:49
And regardless of who's wrong about what, make some screenshots which aren't
postage stamp sized.
Original comment by sudonim1
on 23 Aug 2012 at 10:50
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/4173/gsdx20120823083615.jpg
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7848/gsdx20120823083520.jpg
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/4328/gsdx20120823083507.jpg
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1479/gsdx20120823083457.jpg
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/192/gsdx20120823083429.jpg
remove the .th
its that simple
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2012 at 11:14
[deleted comment]
"And it's certainly not an AMD CPU issue"
I don't put much faith in the word certainly where AMD is concerned
AMD GPU Only bug =
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-purple-windows-underside-cars-Burnout-revenge-Bur
nout-3-graphic-texture-glitch
GSDX SSE2 affected only on Radeon display drivers.
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2012 at 11:31
Are you an idiot? GPUs != CPUs. CPU bugs are few and far between.
Original comment by sudonim1
on 24 Aug 2012 at 12:36
Lets not start name calling, it just leads to stupid flamewars where someone
gets called a biggot and then some foreign country gets invaded for their
mineral deposits -_-.
In any case, 5367 FINE, 5368 NOT. AMD Affected, Intel Not. (Atleast, Pre
Bulldozer AMD)
I won't have access to a bulldozer core for atleast the next 4 weeks
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 24 Aug 2012 at 1:04
pcsx2-r5366.exe is the executable in 5367, this version has no problems with
the GSDX from the latest svn build.
Replace pcsx2-r5366.exe with pcsx2-r5368.exe from 5368 and then the problem
occurs.
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 24 Aug 2012 at 1:31
and Sudonim, its best not to make broad claims like "And it's certainly not an
AMD CPU issue", it just makes you seem like you've never heard of an Errata
before.
AMD has quite a few of these on K10 processors involving MOV and stackpoint
related operations returning invalid results.
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 24 Aug 2012 at 1:42
I do have a couple of bugs in the recompiler code generation i need to fix to
do with my changes, but im unsure if it will effect this.
If you wish to see if im wrong about it not going wrong for me, id posted a
picture on the forums
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Bug-Report-hack-G-U-series-NTSC-U-SLUS-21258-SLUS
-21488-SLUS-21489?pid=256672#pid256672
Original comment by refraction
on 24 Aug 2012 at 12:50
As I said in that forum thread, PCSX2 has different code paths for VIF,
depending on the SSE level supported by the CPU.
This is not a "AMD bug" but a bug that only shows with certain (SSE2 prolly)
code paths.
Original comment by ramapcsx2
on 24 Aug 2012 at 3:24
Ah I see yes, ill comment out the sse4 stuff (which Mine is using)
Original comment by refraction
on 24 Aug 2012 at 6:34
Original comment by refraction
on 25 Aug 2012 at 5:14
Original comment by refraction
on 25 Aug 2012 at 5:14
can you confirm fixed in r5392 ?
Original comment by refraction
on 25 Aug 2012 at 7:10
confirmed fixed
Original comment by danialho...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2012 at 12:22
Good :)
Original comment by refraction
on 26 Aug 2012 at 10:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
danialho...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2012 at 10:20