Closed pedritolo closed 4 years ago
Nice catch, @pedritolo! That bug caused the remaining clauses in the outer for-loop to not be evaluated. If a clause is "all exclude" it should not take part in the evaluation at all. However, the outer for-loop should continue to the next clause. Fixed by changing the last 'break' to 'continue'.
hi, the following block in the kernel's evaluate function is faulty. Btw, just swapping the "break" for a "continue" won't be enough to fix it. Commenting out the block is a temporary fix