Closed thenaomig closed 1 year ago
Upon comparison to the older warming levels notebook, seeing a discrepancy in what range of values is produced in that part 2 example that I think is worth checking
ETA: old version is with 3° warming, new is with 2°
Old version:
New version:
Upon comparison to the older warming levels notebook, seeing a discrepancy in what range of values is produced in that part 2 example that I think is worth checking
ETA: old version is with 3° warming, new is with 2°
Old version:
New version:
* seeing CESM2_r11i1p1f1 3 times? * 45 deg range is.... alarming
The reason that CESM2 appears three times is that it now includes the other SSPs. I agree about the magnitudes... degrees Fahrenheit does not account for that.
Upon comparison to the older warming levels notebook, seeing a discrepancy in what range of values is produced in that part 2 example that I think is worth checking
ETA: old version is with 3° warming, new is with 2°
Old version:
New version:
* seeing CESM2_r11i1p1f1 3 times? * 45 deg range is.... alarming
This is an issue with order-of-operations in the notebook, not a climakitae issue. Will push a change to cae-notebooks.
This PR does several things:
updates the code to generate the global warming level look-up tables, for the year at which a given simulation reaches a given global warming level -- now in it's own file in the utils folder
updates the look-up table files themselves
updates the warming levels class to create separate panels for initial selection and subsequent exploration:
adds LOCA2 data as an option (monthly 3km LOCA data for Alameda Co takes ~5min on the calculate step)
you can extract the data centered around warming levels, or the postage_stamp map data