search

cal-itp / data-infra

Cal-ITP data infrastructure
https://docs.calitp.org/data-infra
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
48 stars 14 forks source link

GTFS Data: Should we add URIs for GTFS for "future" service #1075

Open e-lo opened 2 years ago

e-lo commented 2 years ago

? Should we update agencies.yml in order to also validate GTFS for service changes happening in the future?

If so, we should discuss how/where to add the following gtfs datasets in the agencies.yml data model.

For now, I have added the property future URI to the airtable California Transit.gtfs datasets

Checklist

e-lo commented 2 years ago

Should we update agencies.yml in order to also validate GTFS for service changes happening in the future?

My personal feeling is that this is fairly low on the priority list - but something to track.

evansiroky commented 2 years ago

Do these exist in airtable? I don't think it'd be much effort to add to agencies.yml and everything from there should sort of just work I think.

e-lo commented 2 years ago

I added these to the field 'future URI'

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 5:31 PM Evan Siroky @.***> wrote:

Do these exist in airtable? I don't think it'd be much effort to add to agencies.yml and everything from there should sort of just work I think.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cal-itp/data-infra/issues/1075#issuecomment-1036917965, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGCBI4NMKSUAMMESJHAWPDU2WZ6JANCNFSM5OF24QBQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

lauriemerrell commented 1 year ago

In the v2 pipeline, to download future data we could either: