Closed 461353349 closed 5 years ago
Filtering is needed to suppress so called chackerboard effect (a pattern which looks like chess board in the middle figure). It is cased by the nature of FEM. Finite elements are connected via nodes (not via edges), so the optimization can lead to "void" element here and there in the area where you want "solid" material. Filter radius means a distance to which averaging is calculated from each element center. I usually set radius to be 2 times mesh element size, so that there are several elements in the range to apply filtering. Filter radius also influences size of structural members, otherwise optimization results can be mesh dependent.
Thank for your guidance very much! Avarage edge length could be calculated, So the radius of filter could be set automatically. This would be nice for users.
It would be possible to add automatic as an option, but I will not make it soon.
Yes. It is easy to implement. Setting manually would give more control for testing. Beso is good.
When radius = 1.0, the result is mass. When radius = 4.0, the result is OK. When radius = 10.0, the result is Good. The radius of filter_list has too much influence on the result. So I have two questions about it. 1、The radius cannot be too small for this model, Why is avarage values of nearby elements so important? 2、How to set the value of radius for the users?
part2.zip