Closed Lodin closed 3 years ago
@calebdwilliams, could you please test this solution? Since I'm a Windows user, testing on Mac is pretty inconvenient for me. I'm concerned about if it correctly detects Safari browser and how many cases are supported correctly.
Hmm, maybe I have an idea of a better solution...
@Lodin keep me posted
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
main@ded7a2e
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #86 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 92.89%
=======================================
Files ? 6
Lines ? 211
Branches ? 36
=======================================
Hits ? 196
Misses ? 4
Partials ? 11
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 92.89% <0.00%> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ded7a2e...3625ec2. Read the comment docs.
@calebdwilliams, I believe I finished the fix. Please test it with the Safari a bit more, because it might be that I haven't considered all the possible cases here.
@calebdwilliams, do not mind my changes after the previous comment. That's mostly cosmetic optimizations. Please review and merge whenever you want.
Adds a detection and correction for Safari broken rules mentioned in #84.