Closed zyj1729 closed 11 months ago
I realize this is the sample size thing. Once I remove --sample 0.05, the results make sense now. I would still suggest to maybe explicitly mention at the end of tutorial.ipynb that we shouldn't expect meaningful results using --sample 0.05. Because I thought the model loaded to explore_model.ipynb was the one trained from tutorial.ipynb.
close this
Hello, I've also encountered this issue. I would like to ask, after you removed '--sample 0.05', how many training iterations did you perform on the author-provided data to achieve a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.6?
I followed the tutorial.ipynb and use --sample 0.05 to train a test model, the training stops in 38 epochs. The results seem far off. Is it because I only used 5% training data?