Closed callahantiff closed 5 years ago
@bill-baumgartner @LEHunter -
Do you think this is good for documentation?
Yes, nice. You might include a brief statement about the rationale for the choices at the top of each version
On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:00 PM, Tiffany J. Callahan notifications@github.com wrote:
@bill-baumgartner @LEHunter -
Do you think this is good for documentation?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
One minor fix: Under the Releases
heading, the text for the release 2.0.0
link says v1.0.0
Yes, nice. You might include a brief statement about the rationale for the choices at the top of each version … On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:00 PM, Tiffany J. Callahan @.***> wrote: @bill-baumgartner @LEHunter - Do you think this is good for documentation? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@LEHunter - Great suggestion!
Thanks for your help with this issue. I have fixed the typo and added the suggested text. Please re-open if you feel additional information is needed.
TODO: Is it enough to cite the data sources used in the knowledge graph on the [Wiki]() or do I need to additional information like the license (if available)?
@LEHunter or @bill-baumgartner - what are your thoughts on this?