Closed a5nI closed 9 years ago
Looks good! Thanks! I only wonder if SetWatermarkCenterPos (taking a couple of values as in \SetWatermarkCenterPos{1cm}{2cm} or \SetWatermarkCenterPos{1cm, 2cm} can be easier to remember and shorter than SetWatermarkHorCenter and VerCenter. What is your opinion?
I wasn't quite sure which is the more LaTeX way of doing this. In my case, I only need to use the HorCenter{}. I'm probably wrong in assuming most uses will be either moving the text right/left at 90deg or up/down. I'm new to TeX, so wasn't sure how defaults are handled in 2 argument functions. Another slight downside(IMO), is when shifting vertically, both args need to be specified.(Assuming the second arg is optional). With all that said, I think you have the better intuition on what is more preferred in the TeX world, so I can easily change the interface. Between the two you mentioned, for some reason the \SetWatermarkCenterPos{}{} is more appealing.
This support was added to provide an arXiv like watermark on the left side of the first page. From a few posts in stackexchange, it appears others were looking to do the same thing. This was by far the easiest path to get there.