The timeout for waiting for the calliope to answer @START@ could be decreased a little bit.
Also the repeating of 5 times might be too much - the chances are high, that it will always fail if it happens two times in a row. So maybe 3 would be enough?
The timeout for waiting for the calliope to answer @START@ could be decreased a little bit. Also the repeating of 5 times might be too much - the chances are high, that it will always fail if it happens two times in a row. So maybe 3 would be enough?