I have tested this over a full year of data using the minimal workflow, 4h time & ehighways spatial resolution, and for all sectors that are currently working. It produces the same result, within what I'd say is an acceptable tolerance (objective function value 60.28989523 compared to 60.69680887) that is caused by a slight change in how we apply flow capacity constraints to storage and conversion technologies in v0.7.
Checklist
Any checks which are not relevant to the PR can be pre-checked by the PR creator. All others should be checked by the reviewer. You can add extra checklist items here if required by the PR.
Fixes #432
I have tested this over a full year of data using the minimal workflow, 4h time & ehighways spatial resolution, and for all sectors that are currently working. It produces the same result, within what I'd say is an acceptable tolerance (objective function value 60.28989523 compared to 60.69680887) that is caused by a slight change in how we apply flow capacity constraints to storage and conversion technologies in v0.7.
Checklist
Any checks which are not relevant to the PR can be pre-checked by the PR creator. All others should be checked by the reviewer. You can add extra checklist items here if required by the PR.