Open samousavih opened 1 year ago
Hi, sorry for the delayed response! Instead of making a new test, would it be possible to make this an optional path in expect_column_values_to_be_of_type
?
(FYI, BigQuery fails on this test.)
Hey @clausherthe, thanks for the reply, One option is to make 'expect_column_values_to_be_of_type' and 'expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list' assert precision and scale when mentioned and ignore them when not, which is potentially what most would expect from the test.
- dbt_expectations.expect_column_values_to_be_of_type:
column_type: numeric(2,1)
- dbt_expectations.expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list:
column_type_list: [numeric(2,1)]
- dbt_expectations.expect_column_values_to_be_of_type:
column_type: numeric
- dbt_expectations.expect_column_values_to_be_in_type_list:
column_type_list: [numeric]
How does this look like to you? Only minor issue might be it could fail existing tests once package users upgrade, which could be a good thing depending how you look at it.
Issue this PR Addresses/Closes
Closes #(262)
If you don't have an issue #, please first open an issue on the repo before submitting a PR to discuss the changes you'd like to make.
Summary of Changes
1) A new macro to assert numeric types and their scale and precision
Why Do We Need These Changes
Current macro to assert column types doesn't include scale and precision.
Reviewers
@clausherther