calvez / xcoaitoolkit

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/xcoaitoolkit
0 stars 0 forks source link

Duplication of records while harvesting from the OAI Toolkit #22

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
If someone tries to harvest from the installed OAI Toolkit, the Toolkit 
sometimes behaves weirdly and gives the same record (equal to the 
resumption token size) in the whole bunch of records retrieved in that 
request.

For example: In the Production server of OAI Toolkit, this request gave 
duplication of the same record, all over the page: 

http://128.151.244.137:8080/OAIToolkit/oai-request.do?
verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&set=bib

This also happens with having the metadataPrefix as oai_marc and marcxml.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected should be different unique records, in the response to the 
request.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
It is the 0.6 version of the OAI Toolkit, and the bug occurs irrespective 
of the OS.

Please provide any additional information below.

It seems that the count for the record is not increasing inside the lucene 
DB, which is causing it to retrieve the same record in the response to the 
request. 

Although, it happens for only some requests and not all.

It is a serious bug, and would be fixed soon 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 29 Jul 2009 at 3:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Priority of this bug is high, as it is a serious bug.

Original comment by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 29 Jul 2009 at 4:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Work has started for the bug.

It definitely seems that the index for reading the next record from the Lucene 
index 
is not progressing.

Hopefully would be solved soon and tested at the same time.

Original comment by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 31 Jul 2009 at 3:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Bug has been fixed and the source code has been committed to the SVN database.

As mentioned, in the comment 2, the problem was the same.

Original comment by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 4 Aug 2009 at 1:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Incorporated in the 0.6.1 bug-fixed version.

Original comment by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 4 Aug 2009 at 9:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Its fixed in the 0.6.1 version. Just moving this to "Done" Status.

Original comment by sva...@library.rochester.edu on 27 Aug 2009 at 7:00