Closed LalatenduMohanty closed 4 years ago
@LalatenduMohanty thank for the cleanups. However I think #143 is just asking us to make the license more prominent, not to relicense the whole crate (MIT OR APL2
is fine, and better aligned with the larger Rust ecosystem).
I think you can follow the approach from other repos (this is a personal example I have) and mirror it here, like this:
Thanks @lucab . It is interesting that Rust ecosystem prefers dual licensing.
@LalatenduMohanty that is documented in the language guidelines. It shouldn't really matter for Cincinnati, as the consumer can pick which of the two it prefers.
@lucab Thanks, I have updated the PR as per https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/necessities.html#crate-and-its-dependencies-have-a-permissive-license-c-permissive
This adds license files and information to the README.
Closes: #143