Closed PedroDiez closed 7 months ago
Thanks @grgpapadopoulos, @sebKoeller for the review so far. I will be adding the exception pending
I guess it would be more correct to use the expression "associated with" instead of "associated to" in the descriptions. There is again discussion in Commonalities about including headers like x-correlator in CAMARA OpenAPI files, when the issue https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/issues/77 is clarified we should align the specification here. The same with operation tags - https://github.com/camaraproject/Commonalities/issues/80
I guess it would be more correct to use the expression "associated with" instead of "associated to" in the descriptions. There is again discussion in Commonalities about including headers like x-correlator in CAMARA OpenAPI files, when the issue camaraproject/Commonalities#77 is clarified we should align the specification here. The same with operation tags - camaraproject/Commonalities#80
Thanks Rafal!
Thanks @grgpapadopoulos, @sebKoeller
Will merge it during meeting
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is intended to cover:
blockchainNetworkId
defined two exceptions:Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #19 Alignment with Commonalities#57
Special notes for reviewers:
Blockchain Identification parameter name set to
blockchainNetworkId