Checkout API: Features Discussion

camaraproject / CarrierBillingCheckOut

Repository to describe, develop, document and test the Carrier Billing Check Out API family

Apache License 2.0

9 stars 9 forks source link

Checkout API: Features Discussion #10

Closed PedroDiez closed 1 year ago

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

Please see [linked document] to discuss about initial features to be covered (https://github.com/camaraproject/CarrierBillingCheckOut/blob/main/documentation/SupportingDocuments/Checkout%20%E2%80%93%20Carrier%20Billing%20-%20Features%20Discussion.pptx)

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

As follow-up of yesterday meeting. @bigludo7 @alabajnaid.

Please, can you share your thoughts, so we get into an initial alignment: + Phase 1 Features: Initial version (NOTE: Understanding comment of both Orange and STC about it is preferred focusing in payment part)

Individual Purchase/Payments
Retrieve details of a Purchase/Payment
OTP Payment validation (2FA SMS OTP)
(Highly desired) 1-step / 2-step working mode
(Desired) List of Purchase/Payments per Service Provider and Customer (if we find a solution to show only the payments performed by such an SP)

+ Phase 2 Features: Future version, API evolution

Notifications. From Telefonica we can have support to this feature and we would like to have in future. Nevertheless, no matter to address it in a next phase
Recurring Purchase/Payments
Refunds

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

@PedroDiez: Telefonica OK with the features phases. In v0.1.0 (initial draft, covering first 4 bullets). @bigludo7: Orange OK with features phases. @alabajnaid: STC to provide feedback by tomorrow. Mohammed Najeenuddin and Mohammed Amir attending the meeting

Purchase/Payment model to be discussed deeply. This is just to focus first API proposal

alabajnaid commented 1 year ago

Hi @PedroDiez, Confirmed from our side as well as a first phase,

Just a quick refreshed of something to keep in mind,

If validation has to be done from the carrier's side rather than the developer's side,

Something like 3DS secure banking for example,

Maybe we can discuss it further after phase 1

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

Hi @alabajnaid

Ok, taking note of this. I will generate internal document to reflect the scope per Phase

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

Please take a look in order to check it and be able to merge @alabajnaid, @bigludo7

PedroDiez commented 1 year ago

Set this issue to closed. As PR is merged