Closed jlurien closed 8 months ago
Is it helpful to extend the definition of UNKNOWN, to state it also covers the case where there is a location, but older than maxAge ?
It could read: "when the network cannot locate the device within the specified maxAge, or cannot locate at all"
Apologies, I think I got the PARTIAL one wrong. It should read: If the network's estimation of the device's location partially overlaps with the requested area, or it fully contains the requested area, the result is 'PARTIAL'. Thank you
Apologies, I think I got the PARTIAL one wrong. It should read: If the network's estimation of the device's location partially overlaps with the requested area, or it fully contains the requested area, the result is 'PARTIAL'. Thank you
Corrected, no problem, I should have noticed
@jlurien We have still to wait for IP v6 fix before to merge this one - correct?
@jlurien We have still to wait for IP v6 fix before to merge this one - correct?
It is almost closed in QoD, so I hope we can apply it by tomorrow. We'll have to align the 3 specs
A small proposal for lastLocationTime description.
I see it is already committed. Fine
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
lastLocationTime
in response as there may be cases when there is no historical location data for the deviceWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #102 , #112