Closed ToshiWakayama-KDDI closed 6 months ago
Hi @GillesInnov35 , Thank you for your comments.
Answer to Point 1
The 3rd-party is able to decide which attributes it will receive, when the 3rd-party makes contact with the MNO.
So, the response will be constructed according to which information the 3rd-party has decided to receive. (But available information is within information the MNO has.)
Answer to Point 2 Sorry, we agreed to remove cp_id and service_id from KYC Match request attributes, but for KYC Fill-in we need 3rdPartyId (cp_id or whatever it is called) so we did not agree to remove it from Fill-in Request, while we agreed that Fill-in Response attributes should align with Match Request/Response attributes. So, for our (KDDI) current Fill-in service implementation, we need 3rdPartyId (we will change cp_id to a general term) as it has been in the Fill-in request attribute list and it is in the Fill-in YAML.
Now, I have a question. Do you want to add functionality that a 3rd party is able to request which attributes it needs to receive each time it makes a Fill-in request by putting required attributes in the request body? If yes, I can add them to the Fill-in YAML.
Many thanks, Toshi
Hi @GillesInnov35 , Hi @fernandopradocabrillo ,
I have updated the KYC Fill-in API document draft to incorporate Tuesday's discussion outcome; only the NOTE part. Could you review it, and comment or approve, please?
Many thanks, Toshi
Hi @GillesInnov35 , @fernandopradocabrillo , All, This PR just merged. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
BR, Toshi
API Documentation draft for KYC Fill-in API
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
NA
Special notes for reviewers:
NA
Changelog input
NA
Additional documentation
NA