Open GillesInnov35 opened 8 months ago
Hi @GillesInnov35 ,
Thank you for the proposals.
Regarding No.2, grouping results in nested structure, which may mean easines for people to see but complexity for compuptes to handle. I am not quite sure if it is good.
At least, how to group / grouping categories should be discussed.
If we use this grouping for match request, how are the results returned?
Thanks, Toshi
hi @ToshiWakayama-KDDI , thanks for your questions
Hi @GillesInnov35 , thanks for your reply.
attributes could be grouped according existing schemas such as TMF specifications, as you see the proposed design is close to TMF party/individual resource specifications.
I am not familiar with TMF specifications. Could you advise which TMF specifications I can refer to, for this grouping?
Best regards, Toshi
Hi @ToshiWakayama-KDDI , see bellow links to TMF web site and API specifications on which I've based a draft proposal of new design. TM Forum web site and API Dashboard https://www.tmforum.org/oda/open-apis/table
Specifications of Geographic Address Management TMF673 https://tmf-open-api-table-documents.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/OpenApiTable/4.0.0/user_guides/TMF673_Geographic_Address_Management_API_v4.0.0_user_guides.pdf
geographicAddress : { address: Tokyo-to Chiyoda-ku Iidabashi 3-10-10 streetName: Nicolas Salmeron streetNumber: 4 houseNumberExtension: VVVV postalCode: 1028460 region: Tokyo locality: ZZZZ country: Japan }
Specifications of Party Management TMF632 https://tmf-open-api-table-documents.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/OpenApiTable/5.0.0/user_guides/TMF632_Party_userguide.pdf
individual : { individualIdentification : { identificationId : string, identificationType : string (enum : passport, nationalIdentityCard,…) }, gender: male name: "Federica Sanchez Arjona" giventName: Federica middleNames: Sanchez familyName: Sanchez Arjona familyNameAtBirth: YYYY nameKanaHankaku: federica nameKanaZenkaku: Federica birthdate: '1978-08-22' email: abc@example.com }, Thanks BR Gilles
Possible evolution
Regarding the first design version I'd propose to discusss about 2 propositions
A new design of the Match request could be bellow. Grouping attributes according to what they define. This approach is close to TMF designing specifications and wording