Closed tjvr closed 9 years ago
I agree.
(Incidentally, this is also why the fix I suggested for #15 doesn't work.)
I don't think this is why because #17 was fixed after Lara tried to fix #15.
I will remove the "X set to" part though, I see your point.
We fixed #17, so now expanding a parameter explains what it is: for example, pressing
→
to expand a note announces “Choose a value between 40 and 100 for your note: 60”. The precise wording may need tweaking, but the principle is all well and good.However, we also now announce the name of the parameter while changing it. For example, pressing
↑
will announce “note set to 61”. This is bad, because you can't quickly scan through a range of values. You have to wait for the screen reader to read the "X set to" part every time. (Incidentally, this is also why the fix I suggested for #15 doesn't work.)Reminding the user what they're changing is not helpful here: they had a nice explanation when they expanded the node, and since they're focused on their current task—setting its value—keeping the parameter in mind is not difficult.
I think we should remove the "X set to" part, and revert to only announcing the value, as we were before.