Closed RusticFlare closed 9 years ago
That was decided, an empty loop may as well not exist.
Actually, we can never delete a node from a loop if it is the only one in that loop.
@RusticFlare: it still makes sense to delete the last thing in a loop, since you might want to delete it and replace it with something else.
That is my opinion as well.
Sorry if this was already discussed … On 25 Feb 2015, at 19:15, Tim notifications@github.com wrote:
Actually, we can never delete a node from a loop if it is the only one in that loop.
@RusticFlare: it still makes sense to delete the last thing in a loop, since you might want to delete it and replace it with something else.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
This would require 3 different adding code modes to fix, one for below current position, one for above, one for inside.
A fix for loops is now issue #76
Am happy with "lets you delete sample and synth" part, but if I cannot delete an empty fx; in my particular example, it is inside a loop, and there is nothing else in that loop. If there is another statement in the loop it lets me delete it though. Actually, we can never delete a node from a loop if it is the only one in that loop. Is that something we decided? or a bug?