search

camille-readbean / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

add_app can add applications to a job with no vacancy #11

Open camille-readbean opened 6 months ago

camille-readbean commented 6 months ago

image.png

image.png

Extremely confusing that jobs can still be added to a job with no slots left

Term slots vs vacancy is hard to understand upfront as well.

soc-pe-bot commented 6 months ago

Team's Response

Thank you for the feedback. We have assigned this issue a response of Rejected as this behaviour is intended. Note that it is possible for an offer made to a candidate to be rejected by the candidate, and thus it should be permitted to add applications for a job even when the number of offers made is equal to the total number of vacancies for the job (aka 0 slots left).

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: In this case it should be a documentation bug:

image.png

I like to note that the response messages using the same, vacancies, interchangeably is at least a DocumentationBug as it causes potential confusion.

On top of that you have an area for misunderstanding where slots_left shows 0 vacancies but the UI still shows 1. The messages can be made more clear or be added to an FAQ or a section highlighting the

Right now to me as a user and reader, this feature is hard to understand.

image.png

As it stands I can only have a complete understanding of the vacancies feature after reading 20 out of 39 pages of the UG.
The differentiation between remaining vacancies and vacancies are also not clear.

add_app section can be improved to preempt this error.

image.png

Add app can clarify that the number of vacancies do not decrease by offer.

If a tester had a hard time understanding the app, it is not impossible some users will misunderstand the feature as well.

Suggestion: add to FAQ or brief overview of how the app works at the start.