search

camilomartinez777 / STA9750-2024-FALL

STA9750-2024-FALL
0 stars 0 forks source link

ISSUE FOR PEER FEEDBACK ON MP#02 #2

Open michaelweylandt opened 1 month ago

michaelweylandt commented 1 month ago

Thanks @camilomartinez777 !

Peer Feedback:

It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project #01. Please review @camilomartinez777's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.

Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini01.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points.

For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).

If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)

As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!

Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @camilomartinez777, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.

@camilomartinez777: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!

Submission URL should be: https://camilomartinez777.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp01.html

Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.

Thanks! @michaelweylandt

CC: @charles-ramirez

Chloe384 commented 1 month ago

Hi @camilomartinez777 ,

Please see attached for your mini project 01 feedback. Great job!

What I liked:

Suggestions:

Grading:

Written Communication: 10 Project Skeleton: 10 Formatting and Display: 9 Code Quality: 9 Data Preparation: 10 Total: 48

Keep up with the good work! CC: @michaelweylandt

laurencardieri commented 1 month ago

Hi Camilo!

My feedback for Mini-Project 01 is below:

Written Content: 8/10- The beginning and conclusion were very well-written. However, the questions in task 3 and 4 had no written context other than the question and code.

Project Skeleton: 10/10- Every aspect asked of was completed.

Formatting and Display: 9/10- More headings could have been used to separate your content. However, I did love how you presented your information when you found it!

Code Quality: 10/10- Code was well-written.

Data Preparation: 10/10

Total Score: 47/50

charles-ramirez commented 1 month ago

Hi, @Edodia @lavs10,

This is just a reminder that your peer review is due today at 11:45 pm.

Edodia commented 1 month ago

Hi, doing it right now

On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 7:25 PM Charles Ramirez @.***> wrote:

Hi, @Edodia https://github.com/Edodia @lavs10 https://github.com/lavs10,

This is just a reminder that your peer review is due today at 11:45 pm.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/camilomartinez777/STA9750-2024-FALL/issues/2#issuecomment-2389971672, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5WEXCLZZGCGAYY5XMXU4KDZZR6FXAVCNFSM6AAAAABO5JG456VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOBZHE3TCNRXGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Edodia commented 1 month ago

Hi @michaelweylandt https://github.com/michaelweylandt & @camilomartinez777 https://github.com/camilomartinez777,

My peer review is as follows Project Skeleton : 10/10 it was perfect Written Content : 8/10 same feedback as Lauren, task 3-4 could have had more elaboration Code Quality : 10/10 Data prep : 10/10 Formatting and display : 10/10 I really liked your charts and links to the data.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:29 AM Michael Weylandt @.***> wrote:

Thanks @camilomartinez777 https://github.com/camilomartinez777 !

Peer Feedback:

It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project #1 https://github.com/camilomartinez777/STA9750-2024-FALL/issues/1. Please review @camilomartinez777 https://github.com/camilomartinez777's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.

Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini01.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points.

For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).

If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)

As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!

Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @camilomartinez777 https://github.com/camilomartinez777, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.

@camilomartinez777 https://github.com/camilomartinez777: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!

Submission URL should be: https://camilomartinez777.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp01.html

Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.

Thanks! @michaelweylandt https://github.com/michaelweylandt

CC: @charles-ramirez https://github.com/charles-ramirez

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/camilomartinez777/STA9750-2024-FALL/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5WEXCPDVZFEPSKSL36HVYTZYQR4ZAVCNFSM6AAAAABO5JG456VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGU2TAOJSGY2DOMA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>