Closed camiloramirezgo closed 3 years ago
I can make a point about the missing dash on the treatment technologies table and explain that the algorithm ensured that the treatment technology chosen would be capable of removing the amount of contaminant present in the input wastewater and required treated wastewater quality. Furthermore, point-out that indeed that was the case for all scenarios.
Table 1. Current values. Pollutant type | Wastewater | Treated wastewater |
---|---|---|
Suspended solids (SS) | 900 | 100 |
Nitrogen (N) | 40 | 10 |
Phosphorus (P) | 20 | 2 |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) | 500 | 50 |
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | 500 | 50 |
Table 1. Updated values. Pollutant type | Wastewater | Treated wastewater | Removal percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Suspended solids (SS) | 700 | 30 | 95% |
Nitrogen (N) | 40 | 30 | 25% |
Phosphorus (P) | 20 | 10 | 50% |
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) | 500 | 50 | 90% |
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | 1300 | 120 | 90% |
This is linked to comment 2.5 (#32)
Pag 11, line 34-35: different treatment processes are mentioned here, but these all also target different pollutants. How did you deal with this in your study?