Closed smoelius closed 2 years ago
Thanks. This looks fine except it pulls in a couple extra dependencies. Can those dependencies be inlined as with the current implementation?
(My concern is that those dependencies may have their own MSRVs now or in the future—currently, camino is a zero-dep library by default.)
Apologies, one more change: could this just do "stable/beta 1.64 or later, nightly 1.65 or later"? That means we can avoid the date-parsing code.
Apologies, one more change: could this just do "stable/beta 1.64 or later, nightly 1.65 or later"? That means we can avoid the date-parsing code.
What do you think the CI toolchains should be in this case?
I'd just pick the nightly before the feature was stabilized (and add a comment to CI explaining this)
Thanks, going to land this and get a new version out after it passes CI.
Thanks for being so accommodating!
Ref: https://github.com/camino-rs/camino/pull/21#issuecomment-1212597255
If you decide this PR is too invasive, I won't be insulted if you close it without merging.