Open ThorbenLindhauer opened 5 years ago
This comment was imported from JIRA and written by user Lbk8JgOWhat is this name?
This pseudonym name was generated based on the user name in JIRA to protect the personal data of our JIRA users. You can use this identifier to search for issues by the same reporter.
Line 52.
It seems to me that outerScope is null in this case.
This comment was imported from JIRA and written by user @koevskinikola
Hi Lbk8JgO,
I have successfully replicated and understood the bug that you are reporting. I will forward it for a decision.
Best regards, Nikola
This comment was imported from JIRA and written by user @ThorbenLindhauer
Hello Bram,
Thanks for reporting this. I have updated the expected behavior. The ouput parameters should be executed in this case. E.g. there could be an execution listener on process level that works with them and they should show up in the history tables.
We will see if we can fix it this bug 7.12, but can't promise it. We would also be very happy to receive a contribution.
Cheers, Thorben
This issue was imported from JIRA:
What is this name?
This pseudonym name was generated based on the user name in JIRA to protect the personal data of our JIRA users. You can use this identifier to search for issues by the same reporter.Given: Any BPMN process with a Sub Process with output parameters, but no outgoing arrows.
When: The process is started.
Then: The engine throws an exception:
Expected:
The output parameters are executed without throwing an exception.
Note:
Links: