Error message on delete process definition has a misspelling

[cameronjoebrown]

Environment (Required on creation)

7.19.0 is the version we're using but it probably exists in other versions that include this error message

Description (Required on creation; please attach any relevant screenshots, stacktraces, log files, etc. to the ticket)

When trying to delete a process definition that has active instances using the REST API, the error message that is received has a misspelling. The last part of that error message is where the issue is: Process definition with id: dap_automation_basic:20:3ae79dd0-646b-11ee-b0ad-0e5a7742bcef can't be deleted, since there exists 10 dependening process instances.

Steps to reproduce (Required on creation)

• Make a DELETE call to the /process-definition/{id} endpoint of the REST API with a process definition that has active instances
• You'll get that error message back

  Observed Behavior (Required on creation)

  Here's the full error message received:

  {
  "type": "ProcessEngineException",
  "message": "ENGINE-03076 Deletion of process definition without cascading failed. Process definition with id: dap_automation_basic:20:3ae79dd0-646b-11ee-b0ad-0e5a7742bcef can't be deleted, since there exists 10 dependening process instances.",
  "code": 0
  }

  Expected behavior (Required on creation)

  The error message should be updated to say "dependent process instances" instead of "dependening process instances"

  Root Cause (Required on prioritization)

Solution Ideas

Hints

Links

Breakdown

### Pull Requests
- [ ] https://github.com/camunda/camunda-bpm-platform/pull/4296

Dev2QA handover

• [ ] Does this ticket need a QA test and the testing goals are not clear from the description? Add a Dev2QA handover comment

[cameronjoebrown]

I'm looking to contribute for the first time so I'd love to take this one on

[Prince-Bhagat]

Hey !!!, Even I want to start my journey in open source contribution. So I'm trying to look in to this

[danielkelemen]

Hi everyone, Thanks for opening the issue and nice catch with the typo!

Once there is a PR I'll review it. Let me know if you need any help from me.

-Daniel