Open conceptualshark opened 4 weeks ago
@conceptualshark do you have more internal info on this? Either a Confluence page or somewhere on Slack? We've gone back and forth on this for years it seems.
@akeller I added the internal resources @theburi provided me. The results of the internal decision doc haven't been added yet to the taxonomy sheet.
We should no longer describe any components as a "Web application," but as a component. Any usages of "web application" should be updated to reflect this, or to better describe their intention.
Internal notes: https://confluence.camunda.com/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=HAN&title=Camunda+Product+Taxonomy https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rj_erO5VyM2Huvd4wKzIVNw4pEGWtgSVZZr-0klJIsY/edit?usp=sharing (not yet updated, but should be in order to be considered source of truth) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gozLqfVq8WpSfYV3FXoAQ_HlYTJr2tQ6ldjNI57SUu8/edit#heading=h.5a4pdp93cl4u (final decisions on naming conventions, which have not yet made it to Taxonomy sheet)