nicolevasilevsky
commented
4 years ago Summary: The grant references an Appendix A, which we can't find. I think it was intended to be this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jVai85S3CYsQXcOpxk1KlxcUNLJS0y1ag8Q5x_hK93Y/edit#gid=622961973
@jmcmurry could you please check when you have a chance?
Slack conversation between @nicolevasilevsky , @jmcmurry and @DaveraGabriel
"Davera Gabriel 1:17 PM @Julie McMurry @tricfran Hello Nicole & Julie: I was fw: a note from Harold regarding the status of the Terminology WS Charter and am working on a draft for review. As such, I am reviewing the proposal and other project documents in order to learn what was proposed / is planned. I see under the section for terminology the following verbiage which refers to an Appendix A: "Phase I: Planning The first task will be to review the semantic resources in use according to the methods used in the Semantic workshop described in appendix A." I have searched through the project google folders and am not finding this Appendix. Could I get some assistance locating this? Many thanks in advance for your help! Nicole Vasilevsky 6:16 PM Hi Davera, I am currently traveling for the holidays, I’ll get back to you next week. Happy holidays! Davera Gabriel 10:08 AM ok: thank-you! have fun & travel home safely! Nicole Vasilevsky 1:17 PM Hi @Davera Gabriel I don't see an Appendix A either, I suspect that maybe was never included (and that reference should have been deleted.) I think it is referring to these terminologies/ontologies: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jVai85S3CYsQXcOpxk1KlxcUNLJS0y1ag8Q5x_hK93Y/edit#gid=622961973 Davera Gabriel 1:18 PM Ok thanks... given that its referred-to / required I'd like to be sure, if we can do that. How do you suggest we go about confirming that? Nicole Vasilevsky 1:19 PM Do you know if there is a GitHub ticket for this? Davera Gabriel 1:24 PM Ive not created on but I am happy to do that Nicole Vasilevsky 1:25 PM In the proposal, it says the bolded text is in the gannt chart, and I believe Julie created tickets for all the items in the gannt chart, so I think there maybe should be a ticket already?"
I think this sentence "Ontology and model identification and mapping key components of the competency queries to ontologies will be done in collaboration with the Community workstream" is this: https://github.com/cancerDHC/operations/issues/14 GitHubGitHub 1a5: Map key components of queries to ontologies · Issue #14 · cancerDHC/operations Depends on #13
I think this is the other ticket: https://github.com/cancerDHC/operations/issues/7 GitHubGitHub 1a2: Understand use cases · Issue #7 · cancerDHC/operations Understand the use cases driving the use of one resource by the other (i.e. the use of a terminology by an information model) Depends on #6 Terminologies use cases depend Depends on HOT user stories Davera Gabriel 1:30 PM ok: so we need to have appendix a content to know what we are looking for. I am creating a ticket to address the issue of which target terminologies have been identified. That's what is of issue, not the activity or a description, but enumerating the scope of the content we are tasked to address. make sense? (edited)
If there is no ticket to resolve location of the reference document. That is the purpose of this ticket