Open sujaypatil96 opened 3 years ago
I'm OK with the examples-for-discussion
→ examples
directory name change, but I don't remember any discussions bout it. Didn't somebody from outside of the tools group create that directory or contribute to it? Is everyone involved OK with the name change?
why are we renaming model/
→ linkml_model
? Is this something that we're going to start doing for most linkml projects that BBOPers contribute to?
I'm OK with the examples-for-discussion → examples directory name change, but I don't remember any discussions bout it. Didn't somebody from outside of the tools group create that directory or contribute to it? Is everyone involved OK with the name change?
Hm, I think I did bring it up during one of our meetings, but there wasn't a particularly long discussion about it. That makes sense, I CC the people involved and check if they're okay with the name change.
Edit: There's a discussion thread for the above here.
why are we renaming model/→ linkml_model? Is this something that we're going to start doing for most linkml projects that BBOPers contribute to?
I though it'd be a good idea to rename it to linkml_model
since in the same way that we have the crdch_model
folder in the repo, which is pretty self explanatory as to what it houses, model
was too generic to be semantically useful. Which is why I recommended a change to linkml_model
so we know its contents.
Edit: There's a discussion thread for the above here.
Thanks. We should check with @gaurav and make sure that we're not confusing the examples-for-discussion
with examples that come from the example-data repo
Might overlap with #125
This PR seeks to implement some of the repo clean up strategies discussed in issue #105. The major change in this PR is the integration of the
sheet2linkml
package as a dependency in the project, and the consequent removal of thevendor
directory which previously housedsheet2linkml
.