Closed balhoff closed 3 years ago
Why Agrovoc? Doesn't seem needed for Cancer related things?
Also, FYI, RadLex is also in NCI Meta, so has been 'mapped' to other UMLS terminologies
Why Agrovoc? Doesn't seem needed for Cancer related things?
@gaurav what was that for? I just copied those tasks over from the previous issue.
I've been looking through my notes, and I'm not sure why I added AGROVOC to this list -- I suspect I heard about it in the context of SKOSMOS, and accidentally put it into this issue rather than one related to vocabulary visualization. I'll take it off the list here.
Since we've already included RadLex (via the BioPortal search API, see #21), I'll close this issue.
Thanks. Probably Harold wanted it as a test because he knows it well. Sherri
From: Gaurav Vaidya notifications@github.com Date: Monday, November 9, 2020 at 12:16 PM To: cancerDHC/tools tools@noreply.github.com Cc: De Coronado, Sherri (NIH/NCI) [E] decorons@mail.nih.gov, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [cancerDHC/tools] Incorporate additional ontologies into DICOM SNOMED to NCIt mapping (#19)
I've been looking through my notes, and I'm not sure why I added AGROVOC to this list -- I suspect I heard about it in the context of SKOSMOShttp://skosmos.org/, and accidentally put it into this issue rather than one related to vocabulary visualization. I'll take it off the list here.
Since we've already included RadLex (via the BioPortal search API, see #21https://github.com/cancerDHC/tools/issues/21), I'll close this issue.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cancerDHC/tools/issues/19#issuecomment-724151435, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVZR4BPTLQTH75OLD2POELSPAPURANCNFSM4SPQLEGA.
In #7 @gaurav implemented incorporating of additional ontologies into the mapping tool. This ticket covers adding two additional ontologies:
AGROVOC