Closed keiranmraine closed 4 years ago
@AndyMenzies there is a review pending from 20th December
Code looks good. WGS results are good. Do we know why the results for Amplicon and WXS differed from previous?
Do we know why the results for Amplicon and WXS differed from previous?
Those are physical remaps where we expect a small variance in result (as described in the report).
MARK/MERGE is the change to the code, they are exact as mapping is precalculated, only merging or duplicate marking (with inline merging) occur. These are via completely new routines and script.
@AndyMenzies also, if you compare to previous reports for other tags, they are the same differences so actually stable against the new container.
Agreed, all looks good to me.
This has been pulled into the bwamem2 branch as already approved.
Still setting up additional flow in internal large-scale CI for new elements