Closed keiranmraine closed 6 years ago
@drjsanger what do you think we should do about these? We are going to start having them at the final BAM level but not at lane level. If we skip them where we do currently we loose some of the duplicate and mapping info, but we also don't capture a count for these.
I'd propose just counting them and adding to the output file as we only apply to reads that would pass the usual set of checks (proper-pair, not dup/supp/non-primary).
Thoughts?
Decision to add a new pair of counts for qcfail read 1/2. Counting in other areas will include these reads.
Done, merged into feature/rg_metadata
Modify to accept qcfail into counts of total reads.