Closed papsti closed 10 months ago
I like the idea of having L-V in the model library, but I have a few suggestions:
Making these options available as part of the model library would not take much extra effort and would potentially draw in a much larger ecological audience.
I agree completely @davidearn . Thank you for these suggestions.
Similarly, listening to Jane's talk last week made me want to include within-host immune response models.
i drafted a model definition for the basic lotka-voltera, but i'm running into errors. i'll push a branch off of refactorcpp
with it so that we can troubleshoot.
@jfree-man has completed this task with 8a5d7c10be46208e635aa8abb75be0596f11f84f
Reopening, assigning to @jfree-man, and expanding scope as suggested by @davidearn.
I like the idea of having L-V in the model library, but I have a few suggestions:
* include both L-V predator-prey and L-V competition models * include the option for a carrying capacity in prey growth (so logistic rather than exponential growth of prey) * include options for all three standard (Holling) functional responses
Making these options available as part of the model library would not take much extra effort and would potentially draw in a much larger ecological audience.
equations here
using the new model spec on the
refactorcpp
branch