Closed nottrobin closed 5 years ago
@anthonydillon These are essentially two typos.. as per Kit's comment on the PR Review thread which I co-incidentally just read before this;
"the general consensus seemed to be that it would be helpful to allow for code-review approval with minor changes requested"
@barrymcgee Agree thanks :+1:
Just 2 tiny improvements from https://github.com/canonical-webteam/practices/pull/97#pullrequestreview-177144223