Closed djrrb closed 1 year ago
I think it works! Leaving this open to leave space for any objections
Both look good to me. Does this mean you're keeping the connected bold version?
Three options as I see it:
A) Delete the connected bold version, use the new disconnected version so that the shapes are consistent across the weight range and interpolate continuously
B) Implement a “feature variation” where the form automatically swaps from disconnected to connected at a certain point on the weight axis as the font gets heavier
C) Create a new OpenType Stylistic Set for the connected version, so the ampersand has two alternate forms (connected and disconnected).
Option A is the simplest approach. With Options B and C, a light connected version will get drawn so that both connected and disconnected forms can interpolate (not a problem).
The question is whether the forms are different enough to warrant the added complexity, and if so, whether that should happen automatically (B) or be a choice given to users (C).
I would trust your judgement on this, (A) seems fine to me if the screenshot above shows the thickest weight. We would never use such a thick weight at small sizes, so I'm not worried about any artefacts when seen at a small size.
Yes the screenshot above is showing the Bold, which is the thickest weight. I’ll leave this open and check the rendering before making a decision, and others are free to weigh in in the meantime.
I'm happy with the new disconnected version (A) but again will leave it up to you after you have checked the rendered version.
check rendering
Confirmed this looks fine!
Currently OpenType Stylistic Set 02. Forms do not interpolate.
My assessment is that it is not worth the complexity of keeping the connected bold form as a feature variation.