canonical / canonical.com

Repository for the new version of canonical.com
Other
34 stars 71 forks source link

Update issue templates #1190

Closed akbarkz closed 8 months ago

akbarkz commented 8 months ago

Ask people to include more information as currently it's become standard that people provide only one sentence without any details and then do not get back for weeks when asked to provide more context.

webteam-app commented 8 months ago

Demo starting at https://canonical-com-1190.demos.haus

codecov[bot] commented 8 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 66.55%. Comparing base (9f0f213) to head (7260742). Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1190 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 66.55% 66.55% ======================================= Files 10 10 Lines 891 891 ======================================= Hits 593 593 Misses 298 298 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/canonical.com/pull/1190/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/canonical.com/pull/1190/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `66.55% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

petesfrench commented 8 months ago

I really like the vanilla-framework issue template. I personally find I am more inclined to fill it in when there is more structure and sentences already started. I wonder if we could do something similar here?