canonical / canonical.com

Repository for the new version of canonical.com
Other
33 stars 66 forks source link

Implement /solutions/ai-infrastructure webpage #1266

Closed britneywwc closed 3 months ago

britneywwc commented 3 months ago

Done

To Do

QA

Issue / Card

Fixes WD-10497

Screenshots

[if relevant, include a screenshot]

webteam-app commented 3 months ago

Demo

Jenkins

demos.haus

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 73.49%. Comparing base (6ded9fc) to head (07b3194). Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head 07b3194 differs from pull request most recent head 635cfea

Please upload reports for the commit 635cfea to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1266 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 71.51% 73.49% +1.98% ========================================== Files 12 12 Lines 1039 1045 +6 ========================================== + Hits 743 768 +25 + Misses 296 277 -19 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/canonical.com/pull/1266/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/canonical.com/pull/1266/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `73.49% <ø> (+1.98%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

britneywwc commented 3 months ago

Thanks for the detailed review @mtruj013, I've address your comments in the recent commits. Could you please give it another look?