Remove iot-cert-image-automated from ODM Server Test Plan (BugFix)

baconYao commented 5 months ago

Description

Since the jobs included in iot-cert-image-automated test plan is suitable for Ubuntu Core image only, therefore, remove it from client-cert-odm-server-22-04.pxu and client-cert-odm-server-24-04.pxu plans.

Resolved issues

This is the submission tested on G1200 Server Image

https://certification.canonical.com/hardware/202404-33953/submission/367230/test-results/

Since there's no Gadget Kernel snaps in Server image, hence, all the jobs are failed except image/model-grade is skip.

Documentation

N/A

Tests

Sideload test result shows that no image related jobs be included in client-cert-odm-server-22-04.pxu
- https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/k23YntKcgR/
Sideload test result shows that no image related jobs be included in client-cert-odm-server-24-04.pxu
- https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/PzZDp49VDt//

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 43.36%. Comparing base (070d2fc) to head (84cd4a5).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1218 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 43.36% 43.36% ======================================= Files 357 357 Lines 38684 38684 Branches 6560 6560 ======================================= Hits 16776 16776 Misses 21245 21245 Partials 663 663 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [provider-certification-client](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1218/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `57.14% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

baconYao commented 5 months ago

Hi @pieqq, @kissiel, could you help review this? Thanks

canonical / checkbox