codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 44.18%. Comparing base (
dae49f5) to head (bf394cc). Report is 115 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1310 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 44.18% 44.18% ======================================= Files 359 359 Lines 38813 38813 Branches 6581 6581 ======================================= Hits 17148 17148 Misses 21003 21003 Partials 662 662 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1310/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [provider-base](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1310/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `18.57% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
This job fails on many machines, including some that are certified. I think we can remove it as it makes finding canary running candidates harder
Resolved issues
Canary failing on target queue
Documentation
N/A
Tests
N/A