codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 45.19%. Comparing base (
dfae162) to head (cc2faea). Report is 122 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1415 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 45.18% 45.19% ======================================= Files 366 366 Lines 39107 39113 +6 Branches 6612 6613 +1 ======================================= + Hits 17670 17676 +6 Misses 20764 20764 Partials 673 673 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1415/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [provider-sru](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1415/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
In some SRU runs with encountered
dkms statusoutput which included a warning. The dkms source seems to imply this is could be of interest to a user but not an error so therefore handling it in the test without a failuresResolved issues
Documentation
Tests
Extra unit test added and tested on machine dell-latitude7640-c31002