Closed stanley31huang closed 2 months ago
Why don't we want to run the after suspend tests?
IIRC, the snap interfaces are initialized when the snap is installed, so we should be safe to ignore those tests in Post-suspend stage.
Why don't we want to run the after suspend tests?
IIRC, the snap interfaces are initialized when the snap is installed, so we should be safe to ignore those tests in Post-suspend stage.
I don't get it. What will happen if we test them after suspend?
Why don't we want to run the after suspend tests?
IIRC, the snap interfaces are initialized when the snap is installed, so we should be safe to ignore those tests in Post-suspend stage.
I don't get it. What will happen if we test them after suspend?
I mean the snap interfaces are initialized when it is installed. Thus, the interface will not be affected during the suspend and resume process (unlike the kernel driver, which may experience changes or need reinitialization) . So we don't need to have the after-suspend tests.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 47.48%. Comparing base (
104c931
) to head (bc0a876
). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
update ce-oem-automated test plan and gadget interface test cases
Description
There are two major changes in this PR
ce-oem-gadget-automated
into the nested part ofce-oem-automated
also-after-suspend
flag from the gadget interface tests.Documentation
N/A
Tests
Passed the provider validation locally.