codecov[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 48.00%. Comparing base (
7b5dd02) to head (cca31ca). Report is 7 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1586 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 48.00% 48.00% ======================================= Files 371 371 Lines 39833 39833 Branches 6730 6730 ======================================= Hits 19121 19121 Misses 19994 19994 Partials 718 718 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1586/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [checkbox-support](https://app.codecov.io/gh/canonical/checkbox/pull/1586/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical) | `60.72% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=canonical#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
The quality test was failing with an image with acceptable quality (see #1559). We have modified the interpolation algorithm so it does not accentuate the noise when downscaling the image, changing from NEAREST to AREA interpolation.
Resolved issues
1559
Documentation
N/A
Tests
Tested with the failing image (see #1559) Tested on the failing device. The score went from:
The BRISQUE score is too high: 72.13535618808396 > 60toBRISQUE score: 32.9690039977346