Closed deusebio closed 1 year ago
Test coverage for 55b7ddf2f1dd097136729c74c980e86487992ddd
Name Stmts Miss Branch BrPart Cover Missing
---------------------------------------------------------------------
src/__init__.py 83 0 34 0 100%
src/action.py 154 0 46 0 100%
src/check.py 53 0 21 0 100%
src/clients.py 12 0 0 0 100%
src/commit.py 42 0 12 0 100%
src/constants.py 9 0 0 0 100%
src/content.py 50 0 10 0 100%
src/discourse.py 156 0 34 0 100%
src/docs_directory.py 33 0 8 0 100%
src/download.py 23 0 2 0 100%
src/exceptions.py 15 0 0 0 100%
src/index.py 128 0 48 0 100%
src/metadata.py 28 0 12 0 100%
src/migration.py 87 0 27 0 100%
src/navigation_table.py 65 0 20 0 100%
src/reconcile.py 95 0 44 0 100%
src/repository.py 283 0 88 0 100%
src/sort.py 39 0 22 0 100%
src/types_.py 147 0 22 0 100%
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 1502 0 450 0 100%
Static code analysis report
Working... ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 100% 0:00:02
Run started:2023-09-20 07:28:19.973783
Test results:
No issues identified.
Code scanned:
Total lines of code: 15681
Total lines skipped (#nosec): 14
Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0
Run metrics:
Total issues (by severity):
Undefined: 0
Low: 0
Medium: 0
High: 0
Total issues (by confidence):
Undefined: 0
Low: 0
Medium: 0
High: 0
Files skipped (0):
Overview
I believe the README file was a bit out-of-sync and also required a bit of restructuring and rewording to align with the status of the projects, its aim and the recommended setup
Rationale
Also after discussing with some collegues, I believe the README is somewhat confusing and not as informative as it should. I tried to restructure/reword it a bit.
Checklist
src-docs
urgent
,trivial
,complex
)