Closed rbarry82 closed 1 year ago
@i-chvets @ca-scribner @andreeamun @kimwnasptd @DnPlas
We should move this PR to this repo https://github.com/canonical/seldonio-rocks
Also true for the other seldon PRs here?
Yes. There is only one more https://github.com/canonical/kubeflow-rocks/pull/2
Thanks @rbarry82 ! I will close this PR in favour of https://github.com/canonical/seldonio-rocks/pull/3, we will continue the work in that one, but really appreciate your contributions.
Execution (finally) gives the same output as the upstream image, which is admittedly a Python exception because there's no JOBLIB_FILE from some
seldon_core...model_uri
, but it's close to a working model if not completely there.Primarily, Conda inside craft is an adventure for a lot of reasons, and while this is the first Rockcraft YAML which successfully jumps through all the right hoops, the patterns here (principally the subshell, invoking
seldon-core-microservice ..
, another subshell during pebble exec) will almost certainly be needed in other Seldon images, and/or other Conda images.