Closed SecondSkoll closed 1 month ago
:wave: I think this works.
Question though - why is the 009 rule here?
👋 I think this works.
Question though - why is the 009 rule here?
@evilnick When I merged rule 009 I accidentally left in a field (name: 009
) as I was testing the filter to see if it would pick up a more basic identifier - but it doesn't actually work. Looks like I accidentally bundled the fix into this PR.
Adds issue covers standard RST syntax, MD syntax, MyST syntax, and raw HTML syntax
Adds testing for rule 19 with RST and MD files
Removes superfluous field from rule 09