Closed PietroPasotti closed 7 months ago
Come to think of it, given we're effectively breaking BC and possibly introducing incompatibilities if you try and use this together with another charm (lib) that requires pydantic<2, should we actually be bumping the major? @simskij @mmkay
Come to think of it, given we're effectively breaking BC and possibly introducing incompatibilities if you try and use this together with another charm (lib) that requires pydantic<2, should we actually be bumping the major? @simskij @mmkay
Yeah, this PR should probably have quite a few tandem PRs.
Integration tests might still need to be adjusted to use the bumped version.
this PR adds pydantic v2 support