Closed albertkol closed 2 years ago
Hey, I would have an additional request related to this issue. There is one extra bit of information that the team needs in order for our SSNs to be complete, and that would be the package_type
information (where a package_type
can be deb
, python
, conda
, golang
or unpackaged
). The ideal thing would be to maybe add a new field into the NoticePackage
group called package_type
plus the soss
pocket type, however, depending on how slower this might be to implement, there is also the possibility of adding 4 more pocket types instead, these pocket types being soss-python
, soss-conda
, soss-golang
and soss-unpackaged
. This would then change a bit what is being requested here. I was wondering if this is possible and if it is, which case is best to implement?
Hi @mossoctopus, I believe the first option is fine, when are you looking to have these changes live by?
Hey @mtruj013, thanks for the reply. I would most likely need the changes for this week. Is that too soon? :/
Summary
Add new
pocket
typesoss
.