Closed mattkae closed 8 months ago
I'm a bit confused at what this test is doing, and I think it's because the test isn't testing what you think it is.
I am attempting to test that ignoring exclusive zones while you are a fullscreened surface gives you the whole output, regardless of there being attached surfaces with exclusive zones defined.
I think it would be more obvious what it's doing if either:
* You set up the exclusive surfaces first, then set up the `exclusive=-1` surface and checked its position, or * You set up the `exclusive=-1` surface, checked its position, _then_ set up the exclusive surfaces and asserted that no reconfiguration occured.
(It's possible that this is more usefully two tests)
These two tests sound like a better idea tho
fixes #332
Implemented a test for
zwlr_layer_surface_v1_set_exclusive_zone(-1)
, which means that the surface should ignore all exclusion zones (e.g. a background)