Closed juditnovak closed 6 months ago
I may be wrong, but I much believe that it's a conceptually incorrect way to represent relation-based State objects as if they were functional without a relation.
State
This is small demo to explain what I mean.
Proposal rejected. The name was taken but the concept was refused (i.e. mandatory relation afttibute, None NOT allowed)
None
I may be wrong, but I much believe that it's a conceptually incorrect way to represent relation-based
State
objects as if they were functional without a relation.This is small demo to explain what I mean.